db0 to Lefty [email protected]English • 9 hours agoBorderslemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square109fedilinkarrow-up1297arrow-down147
arrow-up1250arrow-down1imageBorderslemmy.dbzer0.comdb0 to Lefty [email protected]English • 9 hours agomessage-square109fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•3 hours agoShould an anarchist community be able to exclude people?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•3 hours agoThen you will get segregation by ideology, culture, ethnicity, religion etc.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•2 hours agoInevitably, to some extent. But such enclaves will likely be small in size, which wouldn’t let the global scale conflict develop. States have power of all on behalf of certain group, which isn’t much true for the anarchist community. (With that said, I think anarchism is full of assumptions and I’m not sure it’s the ideal way forward; but it’s worth mentioning nonetheless)
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•13 minutes agoI just think that anarchist societies are fragile. Self segregation isn’t necessarily a bad thing either.
Should an anarchist community be able to exclude people?
Probably yes. And accept, too.
Then you will get segregation by ideology, culture, ethnicity, religion etc.
Inevitably, to some extent. But such enclaves will likely be small in size, which wouldn’t let the global scale conflict develop.
States have power of all on behalf of certain group, which isn’t much true for the anarchist community.
(With that said, I think anarchism is full of assumptions and I’m not sure it’s the ideal way forward; but it’s worth mentioning nonetheless)
I just think that anarchist societies are fragile.
Self segregation isn’t necessarily a bad thing either.