• @[email protected]OPM
    link
    fedilink
    12 months ago

    Definitely could do it that way. But everybody is better off if we do it in a planned way instead of leaving people to deal with that kind of a mess.

      • @[email protected]OPM
        link
        fedilink
        22 months ago

        Two options right now:

        1. Run new electrical lines to them capable of providing for their actual needs
        2. Propane
        • @D1G17AL
          link
          -12 months ago

          Propane doesn’t offer the benefits you seem to think it does. It’s more expensive and the distribution system for it likely has as many issues as the natural gas does. Going after natural gas distribution while we still have larger and more significant sources of emissions is a minuscule bandage solution at best. At worst it solves a very minor source of emissions problems at a major cost in both money and convenience.

          • @[email protected]OPM
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Those commercial and residential emissions - those are largely about the fuels burned in buildings. 14% of the total is enough to matter — and when we’re running out of time to get emissions to zero, we need to cut it all to zero, not pick and choose.