• Ech
    link
    fedilink
    English
    53
    edit-2
    24 days ago

    …Narcan?

    *Actually decided to click through to the article for this one.

    Since 2020, Griswold has made available at least $5 million in grant money for more physical security at election sites, which has allowed counties to take measures such as installing bulletproof glass or having Narcan on hand in case fentanyl is deployed as a chemical weapon.

    I know fentanyl is the big scary drug of the decade but…is that something that happens? That sounds insane.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          824 days ago

          You can’t have hostage crisis if there are no hostages. See also Beslan school siege, where russian army fired thermocaric rockets and tank shells into that building with hostages inside

      • Ech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        924 days ago

        I mean…yeah, ok. I don’t think a single incident from 2 decades ago is exactly a sign this is common, but it’s precedent I suppose. Would narcan even help with something like that?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          123 days ago

          Yeah, and lots of people died because doctors didn’t know about it, and thought it was something else

    • Flying Squid
      link
      1323 days ago

      Whether it’s because of a silly reason or not, it’s never a bad idea to stock up on Narcan at events where lots of people will be present.

    • @mkwt
      link
      524 days ago

      That is pretty insane. Opiates seem like they would make terrible chemical weapons.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      221 days ago

      I know that here in WA state last year, several county election offices were sent envelopes filled with white powder, and a few of them tested positive for trace quantities of fentanyl. It’s a somewhat nebulous threat, since nobody was actually affected, but there you go.