As I was reading about the Valley of the Kings again, I wonder why that was actually legal.

  • @benignintervention
    link
    1723 days ago

    If you ask native Americans, it is. Source: listened to stories from one

    • 𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒊𝒆𝒍
      link
      fedilink
      723 days ago

      Yeah, but those greaves are a part of a still existing culture and religion/beliefs, I don’t think it’s the case with the ancient Egypt, Vikings graves etc

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        422 days ago

        That shouldnt matter. It remains an arbitrary decision by the living, who have no way of calling in the opinion of the deceased.

        When coming across a burial site while doing archeological digging just restore it and move on.

        The dignity of a human doesnt go away because people think his culture doesnt exist anymore.

    • @Jamin
      link
      623 days ago

      in the U.S we have the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), passed in 1990, requires museums and federal agencies to return Native American human remains and cultural items to their tribes. It’s all about respecting Indigenous heritage by ensuring that these items are returned to their rightful communities.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -122 days ago

        passed in 1990

        Yeah it’s all about respecting indigenous heritage, sure. Remind me again, in which year they dismantled the genocider statues at Rushmore?

        • @Mirshe
          link
          119 days ago

          If you had actually ASKED the Sioux of the Black Hills about this, you’d know they’ve told pretty much everyone “yeah we don’t like Mt Rushmore, we don’t like Crazy Horse’s relief carving either, but we think destroying them is more disrespectful than just leaving them to fall apart on their own.” Like, this isn’t an uncommon thought. It’s just more complex than “blow them up”.