@NateNate60 to Programmer [email protected] • edit-222 days agoOh boy what a beautiful regex. I'm sure it does something logical and easy to understand.imagemessage-square83arrow-up1337arrow-down17file-text
arrow-up1330arrow-down1imageOh boy what a beautiful regex. I'm sure it does something logical and easy to understand.@NateNate60 to Programmer [email protected] • edit-222 days agomessage-square83file-text
^.?$|^(..+?)\1+$ <answer> Matches strings of any character repeated a non-prime number of times https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5vbk0TwkokM
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink5•21 days agoYes, the first one matches only 2 more characters while the second matches 1 or more. Also the +? is a lazy quantifier so it will consume as little as possible.
minus-square@FeathercrownlinkEnglish3•21 days agoI was like, why specify “one or more” and then make it optional? Isn’t that just .*?
Is there a reason to use
(..+?)instead of(.+)?Yes, the first one matches only 2 more characters while the second matches 1 or more. Also the +? is a lazy quantifier so it will consume as little as possible.
Ah, didn’t know +? was lazy, thanks
I thought, the +? was going to be a syntax error. 🙃
I was like, why specify “one or more” and then make it optional? Isn’t that just .*?