The question that everyone has been dying to know has been answered. Finally! What will scientists study next?

  • @kofe
    link
    English
    41 month ago

    Are they arguing it wasn’t random though? I mean Shakespeare had to think through the plot and everything, not just scribble nonsense on a page

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 month ago

      The thought experiment suggests that over a long enough period of time, every possible combination of letters would be typed out on a keyboard, including Hamlet.

      They are not arguing about randomness, as it is inherent to the thought experiment. Randomness is necessary for the experiment to occur.

      They are arguing that the universe would be dead before the time criteria is met. It is a bitter and sarcastic conclusion to the thought experiment, and is supposed to be funny.

      In conversation, it would be delivered like this:

      “You know, over a long enough period of time, monkeys smashing typewriters randomly would eventually produce Hamlet”

      “The universe isn’t going to last that long.”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 month ago

        Nobody asked but I had to share this

        It’s important to me that everyone understands the joke, even if that understanding robs them of the joy of it. “Explaining a joke is like dissecting a frog. It kills it”.

        But it’s important because I suffered a lot of being left out as a kid. Others found how good it felt to be exclusive, and shoulder me out of things, or refuse to explain things, or whatever it was that made me the outcast. I could tell from their faces that they love the way it felt when they did that to me. But it hurt me a lot.

        I don’t want there to be any exclusivity anymore. Nobody deserves that pain. I want everyone to understand the joke, even if that prevents them from ever laughing at it.