• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    119 days ago

    The whole “processed food is bad for you” thing is junk science. What matters is what’s in the food, not how “processed” it is.

    • @scrion
      link
      419 days ago

      I agree. When I was talking about “processed food”, I was talking about food that has been processed too much, i. e. cooked to oblivion, loaded up with preservatives, artificial flavor, colors etc. to maximize profit by making it last longer, be more attractive / “tasteful” to the point of addiction (think chips) no matter the nutritional value.

      Food is of course processed even in the home kitchen, and there are processing methods that are totally fine (let’s say freezing, canning) and that have a long cultural tradition without adverse effects.

      However, I think it’s hard to dispute that industrially processed (fast) food, convenience food, snacks, super high calorie foods etc. are a real problem. I honestly also blame e. g. the expectation society has with respect to its workers who can’t necessarily afford (money, time) to regularly prep healthy food at home, given the schedule imposed on them.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        319 days ago

        The problem isn’t with the processing, though. It’s too much sugar, too much of the wrong kind of fat, etc.

        It’s possible for a minimally-processed food to be worse for you than a highly-processed food due to the ingredients.

        • @scrion
          link
          1
          edit-2
          18 days ago

          Didn’t I just say that in the comment you replied to?

          Also, ultraprocessed food is a fixed term that refers to

          […] foods […] ready-to-eat or ready-to-heat industrial formulations made mainly with ingredients refined or extracted from foods and contain additives but little to no whole foods.

          It’s used as such in studies and reports.

          https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10261019/