@Maimas2 to ShowerthoughtsEnglish • 19 days agoOur society has long passed the time during which a single person or writing could change everyone's opinions.message-square40arrow-up1122arrow-down118file-text
arrow-up1104arrow-down1message-squareOur society has long passed the time during which a single person or writing could change everyone's opinions.@Maimas2 to ShowerthoughtsEnglish • 19 days agomessage-square40file-text
See, I’ve been reading Common Sense by Thomas Paine, and it’s perfect example of something impossible today.
minus-squareValiantDustlinkfedilink18•19 days agoI’m not sure the Catholic Church would agree that Martin Luther changed everyone’s opinion.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish-1•edit-219 days agoI’m not sure the whole arab or asian world would agree. They’re still colonizing africa.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-5•19 days agoMLK definitely did not change everyone’s opinion. A lot of people? Sure. Everyone? Absolutely not.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•19 days agoAh that’s my bad. My point still stands though. It’s not like he was able to convince everyone to become Protestant.
minus-squareHam Strokers EjaculalinkfedilinkEnglish2•18 days agoThe people who chose to remain catholic had no opinion on protestantism before it was invented, then they formed a negative opinion of it. Opinion changed, cheque mate aetheistises.
minus-squareEleventhHourlink-1•edit-219 days agoThat was not a criterion of OP’s question. As such, it doesn’t really matter. Just that they were changed is the qualifier here. If I were to guess, it at least changed their opinion of Martin Luther, even if they didn’t become protestants.
Ask Martin Luther
I’m not sure the Catholic Church would agree that Martin Luther changed everyone’s opinion.
It certainly changed their opinion of him
I’m not sure the whole arab or asian world would agree. They’re still colonizing africa.
MLK definitely did not change everyone’s opinion. A lot of people? Sure. Everyone? Absolutely not.
I said Martin Luther, not Martin Luther King
Ah that’s my bad. My point still stands though. It’s not like he was able to convince everyone to become Protestant.
The people who chose to remain catholic had no opinion on protestantism before it was invented, then they formed a negative opinion of it. Opinion changed, cheque mate aetheistises.
But everyone’s opinion was changed.
Opinion of what exactly?
That was not a criterion of OP’s question. As such, it doesn’t really matter. Just that they were changed is the qualifier here.
If I were to guess, it at least changed their opinion of Martin Luther, even if they didn’t become protestants.