@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 2 months agoInfintiy Infintiy Infintiy Infintiy Infintiy Infintiy Infintiy Infintiymander.xyzimagemessage-square140fedilinkarrow-up11.16Karrow-down116
arrow-up11.14Karrow-down1imageInfintiy Infintiy Infintiy Infintiy Infintiy Infintiy Infintiy Infintiymander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 2 months agomessage-square140fedilink
minus-square@lemonmelonlinkEnglish6•2 months agoIf trees aren’t real, how can our birds be real? …I am so sorry
minus-squareEnkrodlinkfedilinkEnglish2•edit-22 months agoSimiiformes is a clear and distinct clade. There is no such thing for trees, because “tree” is a botanical classification, not a cladistical one.
minus-square@GamingChairModellinkEnglish1•2 months ago Simiiformes is a clear and distinct clade. Yes but who says that specific clade maps to the colloquial taxonomic word “monkey”?
Monkeys are a social construct. Like trees.
If trees aren’t real, how can our birds be real?
…I am so sorry
Simiiformes is a clear and distinct clade.
There is no such thing for trees, because “tree” is a botanical classification, not a cladistical one.
Yes but who says that specific clade maps to the colloquial taxonomic word “monkey”?