• @FlexibleToast
        link
        112 months ago

        It’s pretty clear that it insuates the sperm that fertilized his mother’s egg in his conception was not the best sperm.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -52 months ago

          I understand the insinuation, and it doesn’t make sense. It implies that a person is the sum of all the plethora of sperm inside a single ejaculation.

          • @FlexibleToast
            link
            32 months ago

            Not if you look at it the way I just described it and you replied to.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -42 months ago

              If he exists, then he was conceived. If he was conceived, sperm fertilized an egg. If that sperm was part of a larger ejaculation, there were tens of millions of sperm involved.

              For the saying to make any sense, you need to believe that a person is the sum of those tens of millions of sperm, and not just the one that successfully fertilized the egg. Otherwise, it wasn’t a part of him that ran down the leg.

              • @FlexibleToast
                link
                32 months ago

                You once again ignored the interpretation I offered you. Just go back and reread it. It would have been faster than making that pointless comment.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -22 months ago

                  I’m not ignoring it at all, I’m directly addressing it. I think we are speaking past each other.

                  • @FlexibleToast
                    link
                    32 months ago

                    I believe that you think you did. I also believe that you’re taking this joke way too seriously.