• @masquenox
    link
    -4722 hours ago

    They would overpopulate and exhaust all the resources.

    Save your right-wing “overpopulation” bullcrap. Barely anything predates on elephants and rhinos, yet they haven’t managed to strip the continent of Africa and “exhaust all the resources.”

    • @AceSLive
      link
      1110 hours ago

      Being fair, humans now have no realistic predators and we’re stripping the planet bare…

      • @masquenox
        link
        11 hour ago

        Humans have plenty of predators. Like capitalists, for instance.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2817 hours ago

      absolutely wild that someone would assume someone’s political views based on their understanding of ecosystems-level biology, but on lemmy, somehow, i’m no longer surprised

      • Joelk111
        link
        911 hours ago

        Lemmy is trying to be the new Reddit after all

      • @masquenox
        link
        -1112 hours ago

        absolutely wild that someone would assume someone’s political views based on their understanding of ecosystems-level biology,

        Lol!

        What did you think the (so-called) “Tragedy Of The Commons” right-wing myth was all about, eh? It’s literally the same argument as the one being peddled here.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          The tragedy of the commons, an argument as to why unfettered capitalism is bad, is right wing (i.e. pro-capitalist) propaganda.

          I’ve officially heard it all now.

          • @masquenox
            link
            01 hour ago

            The (so-called) “Tragedy Of The Commons” is literally a right-wing tirade against the collective management of resources, Clyde.

            Go read it again.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          411 hours ago

          I feel like it’s far more likely the commenter was making a joke. I think the give away was when they referenced a post-human world populated by talking lions.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      27
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      It’s exactly what happens, and we have about as good a natural experiment on this as it gets:

      https://www.gi.alaska.edu/alaska-science-forum/when-reindeer-paradise-turned-purgatory-0

      tl;dr: a Reindeer herd was setup on an uninhabited Alaskan island as a potential food source during WWII with no natural predators. The war ended before anything came of it, so the herd was left on its own. Within a few decades, they had stripped the island bare of all vegetation the deer could possibly reach, and then they all starved to death.

      Also, see predator reintroduction programs, such as how wolves change rivers.

      Elephants and rhinos don’t breed the same way a lot of other animals do. If they did, evolution would very quickly do what happened in Alaska to those deer. Animals like deer and rabbits breed in great numbers with the evolutionary expectation that predators will keep them in check.

      If you think this process is brutal, well, yes, it is. The conservative thing would be to say that this is “natural” and therefore the correct and only way to run human society. This is wrong; we can choose a better path for ourselves while also accepting that nature works this way all the time.

      • @masquenox
        link
        -2518 hours ago

        tl;dr: a Reindeer herd

        So your eco-fash hottake can literally be disproven by the fact that elephants exist, yet you are so desperate to cling onto it that you try to peddle forcing deer into becoming an invasive species on an island they have never adapted to as proof?

        • Cethin
          link
          fedilink
          English
          69 hours ago

          They addressed the elephant issue in their comment. I recommend you read it again. The summary is elephants evolved without predation, so they don’t bread in large numbers. Prey animals breed with the assumption a not-insignificant portion of their population will die prematurely due to predation. If this doesn’t happen then their population balloons until it consumes all available resources, then it collapses.

          This happens fairly frequently where we’ve removed predators from the ecosystem. Its why we promote deer hunting, for example. We’ve removed their natural predators, and if they aren’t culled then they will grow until they collapse. This is well understood and not controversial.

          I guess we could engineer the planet until this isn’t an issue, but that’ll take a few millenia and probably isn’t the best idea. Let nature be natural. It’d be fascist to assume it’s our domain to conquer and dominate into submission.

          • @masquenox
            link
            -11 hour ago

            elephants evolved without predation

            Really? They just jumped from rabbit-sized mammals to elephant-size with zero predation?

            Prey animals breed with the assumption

            This is the first time I’ve heard of a deer “assuming” anything.

            If this doesn’t happen then their population balloons until it consumes all available resources, then it collapses.

            Evolution doesn’t stop simply because predation stops. Yes, deer population will expand if predation stops, but that expansion will not result in some “Reindeer Apocalypse” as the colonialist brain-trust on here is trying to pretend it would. No, it will not result in the consumption of all available resources, as reindeer’s natural environment is vast frikken northern hemisphere continents. If that could be possible, you might as well try to prove that bison hoovered up all the world’s grasslands before humans even managed to become humans.

            Let nature be natural.

            We closed that door permanently about two centuries ago. We did…

            We’ve removed their natural predators,

            …this, remember?

            It’d be fascist to assume it’s our domain to conquer and dominate into submission.

            I’d say it’s pretty eco-fash to assume that this isn’t the exact thing we’ve already done.

          • @masquenox
            link
            -1618 hours ago

            You are aware that elephants exist, correct?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              916 hours ago

              So because Elephants exist, Reindeer can go on without Predators? Dude, this is the most uncontaversial take in conservation. Predators are a necessary part of the cycle. That had nothing to do with how human society should run.

              • @masquenox
                link
                -1312 hours ago

                Dude, this is the most uncontaversial take in conservation.

                So, again. Your Malthusian eco-fash hottake can literally be disproven by the simple fact that elephants exist. Animals can and will evolve to live within the means of their environments. Even humans have been thoroughly documented to be capable of such. So your pretensions that a “Reindeer Apocalypse” is imminent is… what, exactly?

    • @Zorque
      link
      English
      1121 hours ago

      Because their evolutionary defense is literally defense, and not just having enough numbers to overcome predation.

      Sure, there are species that exist without predation, but introduce predators (like humans) and oh, would you look at that… extinction!

      Life is complex, and doesn’t have any one single explanation for how it exists.

      • @masquenox
        link
        -1418 hours ago

        but introduce predators (like humans) and oh, would you look at that… extinction!

        Mammalian mega-fauna stil exists (and thrives) on the continent where human beings literally evolved.

        • @Zorque
          link
          English
          618 hours ago

          Tell that to the Northern White Rhino.

          • @masquenox
            link
            -718 hours ago

            The White Rhino has survived on this continent for thousands of years, until it was exposed to capitalist exploitation. Ie, the parasitic wealth-and-power accumulation of a tiny minority of the human race.

            • @Zorque
              link
              English
              613 hours ago

              So… a predator it was unfamiliar with and had no defense against?

              • @masquenox
                link
                -412 hours ago

                You do understand there was humans in Africa before white colonialists showed up, right?

                • @Zorque
                  link
                  English
                  39 hours ago

                  You do understand that, unlike most wild animals, humans change at a much faster rate, right?

                  The point isn’t “humans did this (though admittedly I did throw a little jab in there)”, the point is “drastically changing an environment can have devastating consequences”.