cross-posted from: https://lemy.lol/post/778691
While I want to block content bots, I don’t want to block useful bots like @[email protected] @[email protected]. Because of this, I will block them one by one. I am sharing it here for community benefit. Any addition/removal is welcome.
- @[email protected]
- @[email protected]
- @[email protected]
- @[email protected]
- @[email protected]
- @[email protected]
gist for programmatic use: https://gist.github.com/ismailkarsli/0c6c7aa4f70d1905adea1b30271f16f7
…I wonder if there’s a programmatic way to detect these bots? Some sort of analysis on their posting behavior?
If they’re playing nice they’ll have the bot flag checked in their profile, and then maybe build a list of any bot that creates posts? As most of the “good” bots just reply to comments? Anyway just thinking out loud. But I’m thinking I could easily add a public API to my search engine that just returns a list of “posting bots”…
They are not identical much. Maybe we can assume that those who are marked as bots and share around 10-100 posts as bots.
Maybe. 2nd idea I’ve got is that if no one is replying after say 24hrs and something like 75-80% of your posts are as such and you have at least 100 such posts, you get added to the list?
Main concern I see about something like this is false positives and how someone real could end up getting blocked.
I definitely want to think on this some more but it might have some legs.
I think
is sufficient to determine a user is a content aggregator bot. Bot flag is an important indicator here. Like the biggest false positive would be ban a multi-purpose bot that also has content aggregation feature.
Technically there is. Bot accounts can be market as bot accounts and you can decide to show bot accounts. There are buttons for this in the settings.
But if bots are not marked as bots, there is no way.
Problem is finding the difference between repost bots and bots that are helpful like automod and link redirectors.