• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    52 months ago

    I cannot stand 2001 A Space Odyssey

    It’s glacially paced, there’s like 1 good scene with HAL and Dave and the rotating set is neat with him running around the edge. It’s about 20 minutes of decent movie padded to an agonising two and a half hours of pretentious nonsense.

    People go “oh, but it was groundbreaking at the time!” We’d had Star Trek for two years by that point. It really was not that groundbreaking.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      122 months ago

      I feel like you have to go in knowing it’s extremely slow and methodical, it really gives room to breath and take in the sights and such. Idk it’s a very interestingly shot movie and I wish more were like it, seems like people’s attention spans aren’t long enough though.

      • @kalpol
        link
        English
        42 months ago

        Also seeing it in a real theater makes a big difference

        • MrsDoyle
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 months ago

          Seeing it in a real theatre while stoned makes a huuuuuge difference. “It’s full of stars!!”

        • @Zacpod
          link
          English
          12 months ago

          Or at home on LSD.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 months ago

      Both of those movies are on my watchlist. My family saw 2001 A Space Odyssey and they HATED it.

    • @affiliate
      link
      English
      12 months ago

      exactly how i feel about it too. the 5 minute long segment that was just nature footage with weird visual filters was also particularly hard to watch.

      i also found the whole obelisk thing super repetitive. i was hoping that they would go into more detail about the obelisks, and explore the topic more. but it ended up feeling like they were asking the question “what’s a list of weird times and places where we could put an obelisk”, and that was the extent of it.