@Yawweee877h444 to politics • 13 days agoMilitary officials reportedly discuss how to handle illegal orders from Trump – live | US elections 2024 | The Guardianwww.theguardian.commessage-square93arrow-up1354arrow-down13cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1351arrow-down1external-linkMilitary officials reportedly discuss how to handle illegal orders from Trump – live | US elections 2024 | The Guardianwww.theguardian.com@Yawweee877h444 to politics • 13 days agomessage-square93cross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@Maggotylink7•12 days agoNo. Just no. That’s been completely blown out of proportion. It’s a reissue of a decades old memo to update intelligence sharing. It’s for groups like the Defense Intelligence Agency.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish0•11 days agoWhich specifically says local police can request us military assistance
minus-square@Maggotylink2•11 days agoIn regards to intelligence sharing. You can’t write a memo to invalidate a law.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish0•8 days agoDOD 5402.01 Sec 3.3 part C © Assistance in responding with assets with potential for lethality, or any situation in which it is reasonably foreseeable that providing the requested assistance may involve the use of force that is likely to result in lethal force, including death or serious bodily injury. It also includes all support to civilian law enforcement officials in situations where a confrontation between civilian law enforcement and civilian individuals or groups is reasonably anticipated. Such use of force must be in accordance with DoDD 5210.56, potentially as further restricted based on the specifics of the requested support. Thats not a memo
No. Just no. That’s been completely blown out of proportion. It’s a reissue of a decades old memo to update intelligence sharing. It’s for groups like the Defense Intelligence Agency.
Which specifically says local police can request us military assistance
In regards to intelligence sharing. You can’t write a memo to invalidate a law.
DOD 5402.01 Sec 3.3 part C
Thats not a memo
Sorry, a “directive”. Same difference, same problem.