• @dhork
    link
    English
    6
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Recess appointments also expire at the end of their next “session”. In recent times, the Senate has held sessions that have been a full year long. So, unless the Senate holds hearings to permanently install them, these appointments would only last a year anyway. Two, max, if the Senate decides not to end it’s session at the end of the year in the middle of the two-year term, as is customary.

    The idea is all sorts of dumb.

    • Em Adespoton
      link
      fedilink
      92 months ago

      Trump appoints a slate of recess appointments. Senate comes back from recess, and holds a year-long session. Trump removes all his appointments. Senate starts a new session and immediately calls a recess. Trump re-appoints all his previous appointments that survived the year, and appoints new sycophants to the vacant positions. Senate resumes.

      Rinse, wash, repeat.

      • @dhork
        link
        English
        6
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Or, just hold the hearings like normal and not have to mess with any of that stuff. It’s not like Republicans don’t have the votes to approve anyone Trump appoints. Republicans don’t gain anything out of this move that they don’t already have.

        I’m starting to think it’s just a big loyalty test. Trump wants the Senate to give it it’s power, willingly, with thunderous applause. It’s like a shitty Prequel meme.

        • Em Adespoton
          link
          fedilink
          32 months ago

          Next up: Trump strongly suggests that all senators dance the Macarena while in session.