If you think this post would be better suited in a different community, please let me know.


Topics could include (this list is not intending to be exhaustive — if you think something is relevant, then please don’t hesitate to share it):

  • Moderation
  • Handling of illegal content
  • Server structure (system requirements, configs, layouts, etc.)
  • Community transparency/communication
  • Server maintenance (updates, scaling, etc.)

Cross-posts
  1. https://sh.itjust.works/post/27913098
  • db0
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12 months ago

    The software is setup in such a way that you can run it on your pc if you have a local gpu. It only needs like 2 gb vram

    • KalciferOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      That is a cool feature, but that would mean that all of the web traffic would get returned to my local network (assuming that the server is set up on a remote VPS), which I really don’t want to have happen. There is also the added downtime potential cause by the added point of failure of the GPU being hosted in a much more volatile environment (ie not, for example, a tier 3 data center).

      • db0
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 months ago

        Not all web traffic, just the images to check. With any decent bandwidth, it shouldn’t be an issue for most. It also setup in such a way as to not cause a downtime if the checker goes down.

        • KalciferOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 months ago

          Not all web traffic, just the images to check.

          Ah, yeah, my bad this was a lack of clarity on my part; I meant all image traffic.

        • KalciferOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 months ago

          With any decent bandwidth, it shouldn’t be an issue for most.

          It’s not only the bandwidth; I just fundamentally don’t relish the idea of public traffic being directed to my local network.

          • db0
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 months ago

            You don’t get public traffic redirected. It’s not how it works

            • KalciferOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Yeah, that was poor wording on my part — what I mean to say is that there would be unvetted data flowing into my local network and being processed on a local machine. It may be overparanoia, but that feels like a privacy risk.

              • db0
                link
                fedilink
                English
                12 months ago

                I don’t see how it’s a privacy risk since you’re not exposing your IP or anything. Likewise the images are already uploaded to your servers, so there’s no extra privacy risk for the uploader.

                • KalciferOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  12 months ago

                  “Security risk” is probably a better term. That being said, a security risk can also infer a privacy risk.

                  • db0
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    12 months ago

                    Why would it be a security risk?

        • KalciferOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 months ago

          It also setup in such a way as to not cause a downtime if the checker goes down.

          Oh? Would the fallback be that it simply doesn’t do a check? Or perhaps it could disable image uploads if the checker is down? Something else? Presumably, this would be configurable.

          • db0
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 months ago

            It stops doing checks. Iirc you can configure it yes