I’m aware of the url mishap with the dolls and vaguely aware of the poster controversy but I’ve also seen people online call it a PR disaster and I’m entirely out of the loop on that

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    171 month ago

    a fan edited the official movie poster that erased half of the star’s face and added lipstick and tweaked a bunch of stuff, the star got really upset and tweeted that the poster was offensive and her erasure hurt her and she wanted people to know that it hurt her.

    so a bunch of people attacked her.

    she wrote more than necessary, maybe, but she didn’t attack the fan or ask the fan to take the poster down or anything like that, she was just letting people know that she felt hurt, and she was rabidly attacked for expressing herself.

      • abff08f4813c
        link
        fedilink
        281 month ago

        Agree with this - the fan just trying to make the movie poster imitate the older poster.

        But I can see where the actress is coming from as well - these feelings are almost certainly part of the reason why the original movie poster from the studio decided to show the full faces of the actresses instead of imitating the 2003 poster in a more direct homage. It’s a tricky balance, but at the same time it’s hard to blame the fan for wanting to celebrate Wicked in art.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          101 month ago

          What gets me is that the reason they changed was to “communicate”, but her expression is essentially blank. What’s being communicated? If anything it’s far less expressive than the wry knowing smile.

      • shoulderoforion
        link
        fedilink
        01 month ago

        wellllllllllllllllll, maybe, but a great deal of scuttlebutt has been made publicly by the racists about her casting, so anything that detracted from her full person being accepted and celebrated, especially hiding the majority of her face, when the studio had already made the decision to highlight it, can very easily be understood as being triggering and upsetting

        • sunzu2
          link
          fedilink
          51 month ago

          clearly the audience is not siding with her on this… she is forgetting what her job is, right or wrong, audience pays so they can vote with their feet not matter how valid her “feels” be

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -51 month ago

        I thought the fan edited poster looked terrible myself, but I’m apparently in the minority there and it’s a fan at it, so who cares.

        " it isn’t about her"

        it is literally about erasing and replacing her image with a different image.

        that’s fine if you or other people like the new image better, and it’s fine for Cynthia to express her upset at her image being erased and replaced.

        both of your feelings are valid, especially since neither of you are making demands of anyone else.

      • @ChicoSuave
        link
        91 month ago

        What the fuck is wrong with that article author? The blanket admonishment of celebrities hides the lack of critical thinking or analysis the author was required to do for the story. Such lazy “news” is just a polarization vector to hate on celebrities and is not worth the time or energy to read.

        • @I_Fart_Glitter
          link
          141 month ago

          The site has a clear mission of “fighting the woke.” It’s main purpose is to rank movies and games on a scale from “Woke👹” to “Based😊” so that users don’t have to be triggered by wokeism. So yeah, I wouldn’t expect high quality reporting.

        • abff08f4813c
          link
          fedilink
          71 month ago

          The article really did the line up of the three posters so well though …

          But I am certainly troubled by those attacking the actress online for having these feelings. That’s not right.

          • kamenLady.
            link
            41 month ago

            I’m similarly troubled and am observing an ever growing inclination towards this kind of behavior, like also everywhere irl.

            • sunzu2
              link
              fedilink
              01 month ago

              The way US is going there is going to be a lot of that… plebs are restless while regime and their whores are tone deaf.

        • sunzu2
          link
          fedilink
          41 month ago

          People realize that these celebs are trash humans and are regime whores… why should working class feel any other way about them esp when they show their ass like this?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        yep, that sort of manipulative dog-whistling is the sanitized version of what I’ve seen online.

        they make it all cynthia’s fault, and blame her for being too “woke” and “virtue-signaling”.

        she’s a public figure, and so she apparently must accept any and all criticism and is not allowed to share her own feelings.

        you can read more honestly offensive anf virulent versions of those criticisms floating around on social media.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 month ago

      That doesn’t sound like the movie studio dropping the ball or anything. If it was a fan edited poster, that’s completely out of their hands.

      • @lunarul
        link
        6
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        The problem was not the fan, it was how the actress reacted.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -11 month ago

        the row had nothing to do with the movie studio, or the movie, really.

        a fan edited the poster, the star said her feelings were hurt in too many words and too dramatic a fashion, and the internet en masse told her to shut the fuck up and she was so selfish for sharing her feelings, she should stop attacking people (she didn’t) and she should silently accept whatever was coming to her since she was a public figure (she shouldn’t) but as a public figure she wasn’t allowed to express herself(she is).