• @betheydocrime
    link
    219 days ago

    I’m sorry, but I asked if you knew what the steps are, how long you’re legally required to wait between steps, what paperwork and doctor’s visits are required for which step, which step is a “point of no return”, that kind of thing. Do you have any knowledge about those topics whatsoever, or are you forming opinions without knowing anything about the topic at hand?

    • BlackLaZoR
      link
      fedilink
      -219 days ago

      Do you have any knowledge about those topics whatsoever,

      Do I need to know? What this type of knowledge brings to the debate?

      • @betheydocrime
        link
        26
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        Yes, you need to be knowledgeable about or have experience with things you have opinions on. To do anything otherwise would be “spreading lies because of an agenda.”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        19
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        Well, it brings the knowledge that if minors do get a double mastectomy (top surgery), they have to be on testosterone for a while (minimum of a year, which is a LONG time to figure out that maybe you don’t like these changes). They also have to get consent from parents and 2 separate therapists plus an endocrinologist need to sign off on the surgery.

        I feel like if you knew this, it’d probably be a lot less scary to you. They have to jump through a lot of hoops and every hoop gives a lot of time for them to figure out if this is the right choice.

      • @pivot_root
        link
        179 days ago

        What this type of knowledge brings to the debate?

        An actual understanding of what you’re arguing against? You feel that it’s too easy for minors to get gender-affirming surgery, yet you actually know nothing of the process.

        If you’re not willing to learn about what you’re arguing against, you’re acting in bad faith.