@bean_dip to [email protected] • 9 days agoMint ruleimagemessage-square21arrow-up1357arrow-down14cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1353arrow-down1imageMint rule@bean_dip to [email protected] • 9 days agomessage-square21cross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squarebabybuslinkfedilinkEnglish13•8 days agoIt’s more funny/sad if you consider how successful chicken are from this point of view.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•7 days agochickens as a species, sure, but there’s something to be said about the happiness of each individual chicken. read a book once that was like “the more successful a species as a collective is, the less happy each individual is” or smth like that :(
minus-squareUriel238 [all pronouns]linkfedilinkEnglish10•8 days agoEVOLUTION DOESN’T CARE ABOUT HAPPY Appreciate your gut bacteria. They love you too.
minus-squareCaptain AggravatedlinkfedilinkEnglish1•8 days agoIf you want there to be a lot of your species, the best thing to do is become delicious to humans.
minus-square@chiliedogglink3•8 days agoUnless you’re a giant tortoise. It took 300 years to properly classify them. Specimens never survived the voyage back to Europe because they were too delicious.
It’s more funny/sad if you consider how successful chicken are from this point of view.
chickens as a species, sure, but there’s something to be said about the happiness of each individual chicken. read a book once that was like “the more successful a species as a collective is, the less happy each individual is” or smth like that :(
Symbiosis doesn’t mean both parties are happy about it.
EVOLUTION DOESN’T CARE ABOUT HAPPY
Appreciate your gut bacteria. They love you too.
If you want there to be a lot of your species, the best thing to do is become delicious to humans.
Unless you’re a giant tortoise.
It took 300 years to properly classify them. Specimens never survived the voyage back to Europe because they were too delicious.