@[email protected]M to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and [email protected]English • 14 days agoWe Study Climate Change. We Can’t Explain What We’re Seeing.www.nytimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square4fedilinkarrow-up148arrow-down10cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up148arrow-down1external-linkWe Study Climate Change. We Can’t Explain What We’re Seeing.www.nytimes.com@[email protected]M to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and [email protected]English • 14 days agomessage-square4fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareRhaedaslinkfedilink9•13 days agoThey aren’t going to abolish NOAA. Just…cut out stuff that goes against what they want to hear. I guess it’s the same thing in the end.
minus-square@disguy_ovahealink8•13 days agoThey won’t need to abolish it. They plan to replace the 11,000 hired contractors with loyalists, just like every other agency.
They aren’t going to abolish NOAA. Just…cut out stuff that goes against what they want to hear. I guess it’s the same thing in the end.
They won’t need to abolish it. They plan to replace the 11,000 hired contractors with loyalists, just like every other agency.