• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41 day ago

    Oh, well that’s good anyway. Is it true that they only have like one major server? Because I’ve heard that, but I haven’t looked much into them, so I’m not sure if it’s still the case or not. To my understanding, they are meant to be a federated network, but really only have the one server.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      315 hours ago

      Of course it is, why would people throw millions at investing in a product and then decentralize it to the point that there weren’t any bottlenecks to apply pressure and extract a profit back out of it? It makes no sense and would be a ridiculous business strategy.

      What is a good business strategy is associating your product with visions of decentralization while never truly intending to get there in practice.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        315 hours ago

        Fair point. They will just grow their user base and then go all walled garden just like all the rest of the platforms. Protocols not platforms.

    • Nate Cox
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 day ago

      Yeah this is still true as far as I know. Honestly this is probably what allowed BS to gain a foothold; I like mastodon too but asking new users to pick a server was always going to be a source of adoption friction.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 day ago

      AFAIK that’s still the case, yes. I don’t have a Bluesky (or Threads) account so I can’t confirm.