Or, you can stop virtue signaling and being a prick, and realize you pointed out the real crux of this is the overall generalized statements they made in this ‘research’. Where is the raw data, why isn’t this open for peer review? Why are so many things grouped together? Are they grouped together? Who and why are thing weighed the way they are. Why is their opinion now some standard? Because you happen to agree with it? That’s bullshit and is just confirmation bias. Also, your statement assumes the child will for sure be trans. Also also, instead of worrying about the here and now and working towards change for a better future, na, let’s base decisions on a distance future we don’t know based only on the politics of today.

But what do I know, I’m clearly not clairvoyant like yourself. So my original statement stands, misleading title.