• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 month ago

      Absolutely not. It’s the other way around there’s a reason any army get spears while swords are just a simbol for nobility.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 month ago

          I’m not an expert, are you? All the in dephts historical weapon stuff I met in my life has told me and confirmed me spears win against swords.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            21 month ago

            I didn’t say spears didn’t win against swords.

            Spears are easier to wield, it’s a pointy stick. It requires less training to use. Requires significantly less materials to make.

            They are a standoff weapon though, in close combat a sword or small bladed weapon wins. Different tools for different purposes.

            The information I’m parroting is from experts and historians and literature and everything I’ve read over my 4 decades, it’s common knowledge at this point and not really worth “arguing” imo.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 month ago

        I always find it fascinating the kind of things people will say because they saw a YouTube video once while ignoring all the actual historical context, like the Romans building their empire by fighting spear phalanxes with sword (and javelin) based legions.

    • @Blue_Morpho
      link
      91 month ago

      At close range the spear becomes a staff which can block the knife and give a concussion thwack.