• @enbyecho
    link
    English
    -23 hours ago

    Breaking the rules isn’t fascism though. Fascism is fascism.

    It is precisely fascism. It’s ignoring the rule of law to achieve authoritarian aims. Why is it ok when you agree with the outcome and not ok when you don’t? But way more importantly, once you do it you cannot go back. If Biden did this and Trump ended up winning - make no mistake Biden has no authority to remove candidates from ballots - then Trump would feel completely justified in jailing his opponents.

    What do you think is a more ethical choice

    A. Because the premise of your choice is flawed. You do not know that breaking the law would stop him. You do not know -with certainty- that not breaking the law would result in that outcome. But we do know that being authoritarian to achieve aims we believe in is no better than people we disagree with doing the exact same. What would happen if Biden was successful in stopping Trump but then, because we wouldn’t ever keep unfettered presidential power… right? RIGHT? We’re the “good” guys… what would happen if MAGA Republicans won in 2028? I doubt we’d ever have another election again.

    • @TheHighRoad
      link
      English
      62 hours ago

      Uh, Trump feels completely justified in jailing his enemies already. Will it happen? I’m not excited to wait and find out.

      • @enbyecho
        link
        English
        -1
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        True. But the one thing we’ve got going for us is that it is demonstrably wrong and we didn’t fall into the trap of proving it was justified.

        Edit: well at least two people think it’s ok to use authoritarian political power to counter authoritarian political power. Do you really think that ever works out? Note that this is very distinct from something like civil war or overthrowing the government. It’s doing the exact thing you don’t want your opponent to do.

        • @TheHighRoad
          link
          English
          21 hour ago

          Tis a risky game, doing what’s right.

          • @enbyecho
            link
            English
            11 hour ago

            “what’s right” is, sadly not an agreed-upon concept.

            • @TheHighRoad
              link
              English
              13 minutes ago

              That may be true, but I happen to believe that truth does exist. All we can do is hold on to it.

    • @Manifish_Destiny
      link
      32 hours ago

      Are you really achieving authoritarian aims if the end goal is not authoritarian?

      • @enbyecho
        link
        English
        -12 hours ago

        Ah, the benevolent dictator fallacy. Because no person or party would ever abuse power or fail to give it up once the “aim” is achieved. There certainly would be no expansion in what the “aim” is. And definitely the people we agree with are always good.

    • @putainsdetoiles
      link
      22 hours ago

      I doubt we’d ever have another election again.

      With Trump in office, and Project 2025 in the pipeline, I doubt we’re ever going to have another election anyway.

      • @enbyecho
        link
        English
        -12 hours ago

        I doubt we’re ever going to have another election anyway.

        I sometimes feel that way. But I still have some faith in people, particularly Gen Z. I believe after the shit hits the fan and keeps hitting it for 4 years, that we’ll turn this around. And because we didn’t agree to make presidents kings we can actually do that.