@MataVatnik to Science [email protected]English • 14 hours agoAnon questions our energy sectorslrpnk.netimagemessage-square144arrow-up1602arrow-down190cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1512arrow-down1imageAnon questions our energy sectorslrpnk.net@MataVatnik to Science [email protected]English • 14 hours agomessage-square144cross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish9•7 hours agoYeah, the environmental issues that are orders of magnitude less problematic than literally pumping the toxic chemicals into the atmosphere like with fossil fuels, vs comparatively miniscule amount of solid waste to store inert.
minus-square@T156linkEnglish0•4 hours agoCoal smoke is more radioactive than the outside of a fission reactor anyhow.
Yeah, the environmental issues that are orders of magnitude less problematic than literally pumping the toxic chemicals into the atmosphere like with fossil fuels, vs comparatively miniscule amount of solid waste to store inert.
Coal smoke is more radioactive than the outside of a fission reactor anyhow.