@MataVatnik to Science [email protected]English • 4 months agoAnon questions our energy sectorslrpnk.netimagemessage-square386arrow-up11.17Karrow-down1188
arrow-up1985arrow-down1imageAnon questions our energy sectorslrpnk.net@MataVatnik to Science [email protected]English • 4 months agomessage-square386
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish16•4 months agoYeah, the environmental issues that are orders of magnitude less problematic than literally pumping the toxic chemicals into the atmosphere like with fossil fuels, vs comparatively miniscule amount of solid waste to store inert.
minus-square@T156linkEnglish5•4 months agoCoal smoke is more radioactive than the outside of a fission reactor anyhow.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish-1•4 months agoThe comparison is dumb. The subject was the comparaison, and not what type of energy is better for the environment. You’re interpreting.
Yeah, the environmental issues that are orders of magnitude less problematic than literally pumping the toxic chemicals into the atmosphere like with fossil fuels, vs comparatively miniscule amount of solid waste to store inert.
Coal smoke is more radioactive than the outside of a fission reactor anyhow.
The comparison is dumb. The subject was the comparaison, and not what type of energy is better for the environment.
You’re interpreting.