@MataVatnik to Science [email protected]English • 18 hours agoAnon questions our energy sectorslrpnk.netimagemessage-square166arrow-up1707arrow-down1103cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1604arrow-down1imageAnon questions our energy sectorslrpnk.net@MataVatnik to Science [email protected]English • 18 hours agomessage-square166cross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish7•4 hours agoFunny how solar, wind, and batteries are way cheaper and faster to build yet people are still talking about nuclear.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•1 hour agoIf only people weren’t fearmongering about nuclear 50 years ago we’d have clean energy today. “The best time to plant a tree was 20 years ago, second best is now”
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish9•4 hours agoStopping nuclear from being built is the problem. We would have had a lot more clean energy than we do by now if we let the nuclear power plants that “would take too long to build!” be built back then, because they’d be up and running by now. More letting perfect be the enemy of good.
Funny how solar, wind, and batteries are way cheaper and faster to build yet people are still talking about nuclear.
If only people weren’t fearmongering about nuclear 50 years ago we’d have clean energy today.
“The best time to plant a tree was 20 years ago, second best is now”
Stopping nuclear from being built is the problem.
We would have had a lot more clean energy than we do by now if we let the nuclear power plants that “would take too long to build!” be built back then, because they’d be up and running by now.
More letting perfect be the enemy of good.