• atro_city
    link
    fedilink
    201 month ago

    I’m glad they at least name mastodon and not bluesky as an alternative.

    • justhach
      link
      English
      6
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Whats wrong with bluesky? Ive been using it fornthe past week and its definitely more intuitive and accessible for the average joe than Mastodon.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        15
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Blue sky has an owner and investors, right?

        Publicly funded organizations should be required to use open solutions.

        If they want to also replicate what they post somewhere open to BlueSky and Xitter, and Facebook, so be it.

        That said, I could see carving out an exception for BlueSky if it provides the full open stack (public unauthenticated HTML, RSS, federation, etc ), and only while it does so.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          229 days ago

          A lot of people and outlets have said Bluesky is open source, which is actually false. Only the frontend is open source. That being said, they do use the AT Protocol which is still experimental, but seems like less of a mess than Activitypub.