@MataVatnik to Science [email protected]English • 1 month agoAnon questions our energy sectorslrpnk.netimagemessage-square386arrow-up11.17Karrow-down1184
arrow-up1989arrow-down1imageAnon questions our energy sectorslrpnk.net@MataVatnik to Science [email protected]English • 1 month agomessage-square386
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•1 month agoA nuclear accident with 1 attributed death and studies showing no discernable increase in cancer rates for residents in the surrounding regions that happened alongside a tidal wave with thousands of deaths is clearly evidence nuclear is bad.
minus-square@MaggotylinkEnglish1•1 month agoThere’s been a few more disasters. Fukushima is notable because if they had built for flooding they would have been fine. But that cost money.
A nuclear accident with 1 attributed death and studies showing no discernable increase in cancer rates for residents in the surrounding regions that happened alongside a tidal wave with thousands of deaths is clearly evidence nuclear is bad.
There’s been a few more disasters. Fukushima is notable because if they had built for flooding they would have been fine. But that cost money.