@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 1 month agoBombs Awatmander.xyzimagemessage-square62fedilinkarrow-up11.02Karrow-down18
arrow-up11.02Karrow-down1imageBombs Awatmander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 1 month agomessage-square62fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish55•1 month agosomething i love about Lemmy is that on the drop of a hat someone is willing to calculate the “surface area to fish ratio”
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish35•1 month agoProblem is, you almost never know if that’s actually true or complete bullshit. It seems plausible, but killing virgins for rain also seemed plausible back then in the 70s.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish12•edit-21 month ago“But it has rained, hasn’t it?” Smug look An example of why arguing with idiots is impossible to win.
something i love about Lemmy is that on the drop of a hat someone is willing to calculate the “surface area to fish ratio”
Problem is, you almost never know if that’s actually true or complete bullshit.
It seems plausible, but killing virgins for rain also seemed plausible back then in the 70s.
“But it has rained, hasn’t it?” Smug look
An example of why arguing with idiots is impossible to win.
The 70s was a wild time.