Perhaps, just perhaps, you should compare gay art as well. Or perhaps even “straight” art, if you’re feeling adventurous! But, no, clearly, the only titillating or indeed sexually explicit artwork is that put out by the furry community.
See that American Gothic painting? Grant Wood must have had a thing for human incest, painting a father and daughter. Why would you ever paint/draw something you don’t want to have sex with?
There’s a lot of folks who find SFW “furry” content “neat”, like this mascot art seems pretty innocuous. Only some of them are also interested in the kink.
I mean… you’ve probably seen what art they commission lol
Perhaps, just perhaps, you should compare gay art as well. Or perhaps even “straight” art, if you’re feeling adventurous! But, no, clearly, the only titillating or indeed sexually explicit artwork is that put out by the furry community.
See that American Gothic painting? Grant Wood must have had a thing for human incest, painting a father and daughter. Why would you ever paint/draw something you don’t want to have sex with?
There’s a lot of folks who find SFW “furry” content “neat”, like this mascot art seems pretty innocuous. Only some of them are also interested in the kink.