• @Zak
    link
    16 hours ago

    the conservative SCOTUS will not overturn an unconstitutional law.

    I think you might be surprised here. Conservative judges are inclined to follow the plain meaning of the text of the Constitution at the time it was written. There’s not much wiggle room in this:

    All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.

      • @Zak
        link
        16 hours ago

        I could imagine them trying to include corporations… but seriously, Constitutional textualism is a cornerstone of what it means to be a conservative judge. They’re pretty content to ignore or reverse precedent, but not to get creative about something spelled out plainly in the Constitution.

        • Nougat
          link
          fedilink
          96 hours ago

          … but not to get creative about something spelled out plainly in the Constitution.

          And yet, presidents now have extremely wide criminal immunity.

          • @Zak
            link
            15 hours ago

            There’s nothing in the text of the Constitution that says they don’t.

            Like most sane people, I think that decision was overly broad and has dangerous implications. On the other hand, if Congress could make crimes about Article 2 powers, that would effectively allow Congress to take those powers for itself by statute, overruling the Constitution’s assignment of them to the president.