• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I think it’s dangerous to be unscathed by governments deciding which publishers publish “truth”, and which don’t.

    To not care if the “law” applies to 100% of the population, or only 95%. Some more equal under the law than others.

    I bring up 3, because the idea behind www was to counteract the points above.

    Imagine the same techniques used by a government you do not agree with. It’s very scary, no?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 month ago

      That has nothing to do with what I was answering to OP (who seems to have a difficult time translating ‘operating in’ to ‘being reachable from’), I don’t know why you are trying to debate (?) me on something else completely. Same goes for the www, I’ve never called it that.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 month ago

        I’m sorry your anger doesn’t allow you to see the connection between the technical implementation, and philosophy of www, and your own answer to OPs question.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          130 days ago

          I’m not angry, that’s in your mind. You seem to have a habit of linking things that shouldn’t be linked. Good day.