@just_another_person to scienceEnglish • 8 hours agoScientists Reveal a Shocking Solution to The Chicken or Egg Paradoxwww.sciencealert.comexternal-linkmessage-square22arrow-up139arrow-down110
arrow-up129arrow-down1external-linkScientists Reveal a Shocking Solution to The Chicken or Egg Paradoxwww.sciencealert.com@just_another_person to scienceEnglish • 8 hours agomessage-square22
minus-square@CypherlinkEnglish1•5 hours agoAsexual reproduction has been observed, measured, studied and is fairly well understood. The specific claim that all multicellular life starts with two zygotes merging is incorrect. While not the main thrust of the article it is wrong. Your additional claims are simply absurd and you could spend some minimal effort to understand asexual reproduction before making ignorant claims. Here I will give you a place to start: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=asexual+reproduction+in+animals&oq=asexual+rep
minus-square@just_another_personOPlinkEnglish0•5 hours agoRead your own link. These are all observed after the fact, and the catalyst is not understood. The frequency is also not tied to avian or warmbloods which is even more rare than a mechanism that exists in certain life forms already. What are you talking about?
minus-square@CypherlinkEnglish0•5 hours ago What are you talking about? It is known as a fact that asexual reproduction does occur and does not involve the merging of two zygotes. Everything else you have spouted is purely irrelevant and is deflection. It is clear you have too much ego to properly participate in science.
minus-square@just_another_personOPlinkEnglish0•5 hours agoLol. This is Lemmy. Better get off that horse before you hurt yourself.
Asexual reproduction has been observed, measured, studied and is fairly well understood.
The specific claim that all multicellular life starts with two zygotes merging is incorrect. While not the main thrust of the article it is wrong.
Your additional claims are simply absurd and you could spend some minimal effort to understand asexual reproduction before making ignorant claims.
Here I will give you a place to start: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=asexual+reproduction+in+animals&oq=asexual+rep
Read your own link. These are all observed after the fact, and the catalyst is not understood. The frequency is also not tied to avian or warmbloods which is even more rare than a mechanism that exists in certain life forms already.
What are you talking about?
It is known as a fact that asexual reproduction does occur and does not involve the merging of two zygotes.
Everything else you have spouted is purely irrelevant and is deflection.
It is clear you have too much ego to properly participate in science.
Lol.
This is Lemmy. Better get off that horse before you hurt yourself.