Nov 19 (Reuters) - President Joe Biden has approved provision of anti-personnel land mines to Ukraine, a U.S. official told Reuters, a step that could help slow Russian advances in its east, especially when used along with other munitions from the United States.

The United States expects Ukraine to use the mines in its own territory, though it has committed not to use them in areas populated with its own civilians, the official said. The Washington Post first reported the development.

The office of Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, the Ukrainian defence ministry, the Russian defence ministry and the Kremlin did not immediately respond to Reuters’ requests to comment.

The United States has provided Ukraine with anti-tank mines throughout its war with Russia, but the addition of anti-personnel mines aims at blunting the advance of Russian ground troops, the official added, speaking on condition of anonymity.

    • @thedirtyknapkin
      link
      English
      53 months ago

      or how about this, both of them are terrible for this. i strongly support Ukraine’s right to defend its borders, but landmines belong in the far distant pass. if Russia drops a bioweapon on kyiev will we follow suit? i sure fucking hope not.

      grow a spine and actually believe in something for yourself. landmines are wrong, no matter who uses them or why they are used.

      • @PugJesus
        link
        English
        23 months ago

        i strongly support Ukraine’s right to defend its borders, but landmines belong in the far distant pass. if Russia drops a bioweapon on kyiev will we follow suit?

        This may be shocking, but landmines and bioweapons are not even close to equivalent.

        • @thedirtyknapkin
          link
          English
          1
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          i didn’t say they were equivalent, i said they’re both blights that remain in the past. terrible things that cause mass civilian casualties for decades after the conflict.

          one can still be worse than the other, but anyone that uses them should be punished.

    • @Viking_Hippie
      link
      English
      -53 months ago

      Textbook whataboutism. Are you aware that two wrongs do NOT in fact make a right? And that crimes against humanity don’t cease to be criminal atrocities because someone did them to you first?

      In other words: are you ignorant, a hypocrite, or an ignorant hypocrite when it comes to the victims of war crimes committing war crimes?

      • Cethin
        link
        fedilink
        English
        63 months ago

        Two wrongs don’t make a right, but if you die it doesn’t matter if you were wrong or right.

      • @PugJesus
        link
        English
        23 months ago

        Landmines are a crime against humanity now? Jesus fucking Christ.

          • @PugJesus
            link
            English
            23 months ago

            Working to ban something means it’s a crime against humanity. Great. Alright.

            • @dwalin
              link
              English
              13 months ago

              Thats how crimes against humanity work. People find it so abhorrent they sign a treaty.

              • @PugJesus
                link
                English
                43 months ago

                Not everything banned by treaty is a crime against humanity, though.

            • @Viking_Hippie
              link
              English
              -13 months ago

              No. Got the order wrong. People are working to ban them because they’re atrocious. They’re not atrocious because people are working to ban them. Don’t pretend to be even more obtuse than you already are.

              They’re atrocious because they can make areas dangerous for anyone to traverse for years if not decades, blowing the limbs off of innocent civilians or making large swaths of land uninhabitable and unavailable to farm without risking death and dismemberment.

              • @PugJesus
                link
                English
                53 months ago

                They’re atrocious because they can make areas dangerous for anyone to traverse for years if not decades, blowing the limbs off of innocent civilians or making large swaths of land uninhabitable and unavailable to farm without risking death and dismemberment.

                So like all UXO that’s indiscriminately used?

                • @Viking_Hippie
                  link
                  English
                  13 months ago

                  Yes. “Indiscriminately” being the operative word.

                  Russians butchering civilians doesn’t make it ok for Ukraine to emulate them.

                  • @PugJesus
                    link
                    English
                    3
                    edit-2
                    3 months ago

                    Yes. “Indiscriminately” being the operative word.

                    See? I agree. Landmines should not be used indiscriminately. Luckily, Ukraine has already pledged to not use them in civilian areas, and landmine protocols are a far fucking cry from the Vietnam era, so we’re good.

                    Glad to see we’re all on the same page of not demanding that victims meekly submit to genocide in the name of some nebulous and ill-defined moral high ground.

                    How many thousands of Ukranian lives are worth not using landmines to you? Tens of thousands?