@BadmanDan to politics • 2 months agoKamala Harris won politicaly engaged voters, but lost voters who don't follow politics.www.nbcnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square255arrow-up1464arrow-down129
arrow-up1435arrow-down1external-linkKamala Harris won politicaly engaged voters, but lost voters who don't follow politics.www.nbcnews.com@BadmanDan to politics • 2 months agomessage-square255
minus-squarecapitallink6•2 months agoI can go ahead and call 2028 for you now. It’s gonna be the Dem or Rep nominee. It is binary. If you believe another outcome is likely, let’s bet money.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•2 months agoKalama lost bc voters for who voting is a real burden didn’t show up to vote. They are poor and likely people of color. Fuck off with blaming people.
minus-squarecapitallink-6•2 months agoHey I’ll likely be fine. Better off than the people you identified in your comment. I’m a cis white male who makes ~$250k/yr. The ones who sat at home are likely going to be much worse off. At least it’s gonna be very hard to make the brain dead “both sides” argument over the next 4 years.
minus-squareDiva (she/her)linkfedilink3•2 months ago I’m a cis white male who makes ~$250k/yr. opinion discarded
minus-squarecapitallink-3•edit-22 months agoSounds about right. It’s just too much to expect lots of you to simply evaluate an idea on its merits. See you in 2028 when the Dem or Rep wins again.
minus-squareDiva (she/her)linkfedilink4•edit-22 months ago See you in 2028 when the Dem or Rep wins again. appeal to futility, false dichotomy 🤓
minus-squarecapitallink-3•edit-22 months agoFunny. I was told that was a false dichotomy before the most recent election too. Somehow I just continue being proved right. This is my cross to bear.
minus-squareDiva (she/her)linkfedilink2•edit-22 months agowow, dogshit party will get elected in the hitlerite country, amazing insight, I can see why you get paid the big bucks
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•2 months agoWhy aren’t you working to replace First past the post voting in your state so there can be more then two options?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish-1•2 months agoIt’s binary because voters keep it that way
minus-squareObliviousEnlightenmentlink-1•2 months agoIt literally doesnt though. Its because of how our votes are tallied, First Past the Post. If a third party ever reached viability, theyd just split the same half of voters with whichever large party theyre closer to
minus-squarecapitallink-3•edit-22 months agoSure. Agreed. That doesn’t change the fact. I made no claim about the mechanics of it. Only the outcome.
I can go ahead and call 2028 for you now.
It’s gonna be the Dem or Rep nominee.
It is binary. If you believe another outcome is likely, let’s bet money.
Kalama lost bc voters for who voting is a real burden didn’t show up to vote. They are poor and likely people of color. Fuck off with blaming people.
Hey I’ll likely be fine. Better off than the people you identified in your comment.
I’m a cis white male who makes ~$250k/yr.
The ones who sat at home are likely going to be much worse off.
At least it’s gonna be very hard to make the brain dead “both sides” argument over the next 4 years.
opinion discarded
Sounds about right.
It’s just too much to expect lots of you to simply evaluate an idea on its merits.
See you in 2028 when the Dem or Rep wins again.
appeal to futility, false dichotomy 🤓
Funny. I was told that was a false dichotomy before the most recent election too.
Somehow I just continue being proved right. This is my cross to bear.
wow, dogshit party will get elected in the hitlerite country, amazing insight, I can see why you get paid the big bucks
Wait, so now it’s not a false dichotomy?
Why aren’t you working to replace First past the post voting in your state so there can be more then two options?
It’s binary because voters keep it that way
It literally doesnt though. Its because of how our votes are tallied, First Past the Post. If a third party ever reached viability, theyd just split the same half of voters with whichever large party theyre closer to
Sure. Agreed.
That doesn’t change the fact.
I made no claim about the mechanics of it. Only the outcome.