• @De_Narm
    link
    10
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    That is a very human centric way to approach it. For starters, we don’t even know if other life has to be carbon based, let alone in which environments it exists. There could be an entirely different ruleset to their reproduction and of course their society. And even ignoring all these things, they could simply advance a lot faster, outpacing climate change and declining populations. Heck, we could be outpacing these problems if we never stopped puring endless ressources into space travel, but alas, capitalism deemed it unworthy.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 month ago

      Yes, as a human, i usually have human-centric thoughts.

      You are right, of course.

      Sorry for sharing my thoughts.

      • @De_Narm
        link
        8
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Don’t apologize, I didn’t mean to invalidate your thoughts. Until we’ve found other life, everything is possible. Maybe they all are slightly different humanoids with similar problems. In fact, many theories about why we haven’t found anything yet are based on the very same assumption.

        I just meant to add some additional food for thought.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 month ago

          It’s fine, I’ll just go cry.

          No, no worries. lol
          I recognize that realistically that’s not reasonable on a universal scale, even if humanity were to follow that path. It’s just an interesting thought experiment.

    • @Olhonestjim
      link
      21 month ago

      It’s hard to beat carbon as a building block though.

      • @De_Narm
        link
        21 month ago

        In theory, other elements are possible. There’s even a list available on wikipedia.