Kaptaan Jack to Programmer [email protected] • 1 year agoAlphabetically sorted months. But WHY?lemmy.mlimagemessage-square36fedilinkarrow-up1660arrow-down114
arrow-up1646arrow-down1imageAlphabetically sorted months. But WHY?lemmy.mlKaptaan Jack to Programmer [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square36fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink13•1 year agoObviously it’s a an act of protest so the months are officially remade to be alphabetically ordered.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink6•1 year agoCan’t we just call them month 1 to month 12 like CJK languages do?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink10•1 year agoBut in alphabetical order: 1, 10, 11, 12, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink4•1 year agoThis is not even in alphabetical order, three couldn’t be before the four.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•1 year agoComputers sometimes sort in this logic: “1” is the first digit so everything that starts with “1” comes first. Alphabetical in this sense, not the names of the numbers written out as done in another comment under this post.
Obviously it’s a an act of protest so the months are officially remade to be alphabetically ordered.
Can’t we just call them
month 1
tomonth 12
like CJK languages do?But in alphabetical order: 1, 10, 11, 12, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
This is not even in alphabetical order, three couldn’t be before the four.
Computers sometimes sort in this logic: “1” is the first digit so everything that starts with “1” comes first. Alphabetical in this sense, not the names of the numbers written out as done in another comment under this post.
Which is why ISO 8601 is superior.
No, it has to be month 0 to 11.