They had no problems taking everyone’s money. Maybe companies should limit the number of sales when deploying a product tied to services they operate and need to scale.

  • @einlander
    link
    English
    69 hours ago

    Didn’t account for the initial interest peak.

    • @ampersandrew
      link
      English
      219 hours ago

      No, that’s what I’m saying. That peak is well under what they claimed they simulated.

      • Album
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -39 hours ago

        Peak concurrent was marred by the game not being playable. It’s not really a good indicator here.

        • @ampersandrew
          link
          English
          189 hours ago

          It is, because everyone trying to download assets from the game servers were doing so from the executable that Steam tracks as running.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            6 hours ago

            You don’t have to buy it from steam, might’ve been more users from gamepass and xbox than steam?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              43 hours ago

              It is a flight simulator, somehow I doubt it has more console than PC users. Consoles are just too limited to satisfy that particular demographic. Can’t even connect half a dozen different input devices to a console.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 hour ago

                Dunno what the sales for the new one are like, but the 2020 ms flight sim had a lot more mass appeal than any older flight sims, but maybe a lot of xbox players were put off by the pre download requirements?

                Also when it’s on game pass the barrier to entry is a lot lower, as a lot of people might install it with the intention of only playing it for like 5 minutes to see if they can see thier house or something, which they probably wouldn’t pay full price on steam to do 😅

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  1
                  edit-2
                  1 hour ago

                  But yeah it definitely sounds like thier test for 200k players probably had bigger instances provisioned than what they ended up using in the production release 😅

                  You’d think they’d be able to do some sort of auto scaling when demand goes up though… 😅

            • @ampersandrew
              link
              English
              55 hours ago

              Perhaps, but 10x as many? I suppose it’s possible, but I don’t think it’s likely.

          • Album
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -4
            edit-2
            9 hours ago

            It’s not, because downloading assets was not working, and with it not working eventually the user will shut it down thus having an effect on peak concurrent. It’s not even that complex. If people can play your game they will stay on it increasing the count, if people cannot play your game they will not, thus decreasing the count.

            • @ampersandrew
              link
              English
              99 hours ago

              Exactly. The peak number of people trying to download it simultaneously was about 24k. They didn’t all stick around because it wasn’t working, even though that’s about 1/10th of what the devs expected and prepared for the demand to be. They didn’t get anywhere close to 200k people all hitting that server at once.