• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    40
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Wow, that was an incredibly out of touch and frustrating thing to read. The author has no idea what they’re talking about.

    in a highly polarised US political landscape, the anguish about his governmental role may be little more than a knee-jerk reaction from the millions of people whose side he did not choose.

    No, it’s a reaction to genuinely absurd proposals for how to save money. For example, if they were able to successfully fire every single federal employee, it would save the government just over $100 billion. That money goes to pay the salaries of around 1.5 million federal employees. That’s nothing compared to the entire military budget, for example. So, even accomplishing their goal of firing as many civil servants as possible would save very little money in the scheme of things. All it would accomplish is ruining many basic services that people rely on every day to live a relatively safe and healthy life.

    But what this article most glaringly ignores is that this Government Efficiency talk is disingenuous from the start. It’s not about efficiency, it’s about gutting as much of the government as possible so it breaks. That’s what they want, and they’ve been quite open about it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      104 days ago

      That’s also now 1.5 million people out of work and not “contributing” to the economy, not spending money or generating tax revenue.

      But any step past “step 1” is too far for Elmo to think about.