• ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 month ago

      Well for one, I’m glad law enforcement are required to have body cams for accountability. Imagine if police unions lobbied so that the body cam requirement is be removed because of privacy reasons.

      • @Arbiter
        link
        521 month ago

        Except they have full control over those cameras and the footage they record.

        Anytime there’s misconduct they just refuse to release the footage or they turn off the camera.

        • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed
          link
          fedilink
          English
          101 month ago

          We should have civil rights organizations be in charge of the footage.

          Make them automatically upload to ACLU servers.

          Police brutality plummets.

          • @Arbiter
            link
            141 month ago

            Except even when they are filmed nothing happens, they just get paid leave or shuffled to another department.

            • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed
              link
              fedilink
              English
              18
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Before video evidence became a thing, almost 0% of police brutality would face any consequences. With video, its now non-zero, should be ideally at 100%, but getting the statistic away from 0% is a great start. The murderer of George Floyd would’ve walked away without video evidence. When there’s more cameras, the odds of punishment is better than without cameras.

              • @Arbiter
                link
                31 month ago

                That’s a fair point, I’m just skeptical how much of a difference a new tech gadget can make on systemic issues.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              31 month ago

              At least then the victim’s family can get a wrongful death payout. It would be even better if they abolished qualified immunity.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 month ago

          And it works just like when people plead the fifth. I.e., immediately under suspicion.

          Our cops here are increasingly being questioned when their cams aren’t ‘on’ as it’s procedure to turn them ‘on’ - they are on but not storing, and when activated they immediately dump the 30sec buffer to disk and then write new stuff - and anything that goes down a little hinky means they’re directly on the hot seat.

          You guys need to pay your cops more, and get a better class of applicants.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        251 month ago

        It’s fine for cops to have less privacy than normal workers, considering they are given much more responsibility and power.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          11 month ago

          They are recording what the police do and say. It clearly doesn’t make a difference that the camera is technically pointing away from them. Do you think this person would have been ok with wearing a corporate bodycam because it isn’t pointing at her? No obviously not.

          The thing that is different is that police have control of it, and they generally only use it in public where there’s no expectation of privacy, and they’re the bloody police and have guns and kill people!