@renzev to Lemmy ShitpostEnglish • 21 hours agoThanks for the warning I guess??imagemessage-square52arrow-up1580arrow-down127
arrow-up1553arrow-down1imageThanks for the warning I guess??@renzev to Lemmy ShitpostEnglish • 21 hours agomessage-square52
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink27•17 hours agoI really hate that “no one:” shit, it often doesn’t make any sense to me.
minus-square@Pacattack57link7•12 hours agoIt’s just a qualifier to insinuate that no one cares about a certain topic and then there’s that one person that brings it up out of no where.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink8•edit-211 hours agoShouldn’t it be “everybody: <blank>” then? Nobody: <blank> means that everyone has some feelings about it. If it’s Nobody and the second line applying to the same thing then the nobody part is false, because the second bit implies that at least one person feels that way. I just don’t get it, logically.
How to improve a meme in one easy step
I really hate that “no one:” shit, it often doesn’t make any sense to me.
No one:
[email protected]:
It’s just a qualifier to insinuate that no one cares about a certain topic and then there’s that one person that brings it up out of no where.
Shouldn’t it be “everybody: <blank>” then?
Nobody: <blank> means that everyone has some feelings about it.
If it’s Nobody and the second line applying to the same thing then the nobody part is false, because the second bit implies that at least one person feels that way.
I just don’t get it, logically.