@renzev to Lemmy ShitpostEnglish • 2 months agoThanks for the warning I guess??imagemessage-square77arrow-up1751arrow-down133
arrow-up1718arrow-down1imageThanks for the warning I guess??@renzev to Lemmy ShitpostEnglish • 2 months agomessage-square77
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink37•2 months agoI really hate that “no one:” shit, it often doesn’t make any sense to me.
minus-square@Pacattack57link11•2 months agoIt’s just a qualifier to insinuate that no one cares about a certain topic and then there’s that one person that brings it up out of no where.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink13•edit-22 months agoShouldn’t it be “everybody: <blank>” then? Nobody: <blank> means that everyone has some feelings about it. If it’s Nobody and the second line applying to the same thing then the nobody part is false, because the second bit implies that at least one person feels that way. I just don’t get it, logically.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink4•2 months ago“Nobody has said anything” sounds a bit better than “everyone has said nothing”, which is about how it should be interpreted.
How to improve a meme in one easy step
I really hate that “no one:” shit, it often doesn’t make any sense to me.
No one:
[email protected]:
It’s just a qualifier to insinuate that no one cares about a certain topic and then there’s that one person that brings it up out of no where.
Shouldn’t it be “everybody: <blank>” then?
Nobody: <blank> means that everyone has some feelings about it.
If it’s Nobody and the second line applying to the same thing then the nobody part is false, because the second bit implies that at least one person feels that way.
I just don’t get it, logically.
“Nobody has said anything” sounds a bit better than “everyone has said nothing”, which is about how it should be interpreted.