I’m usually the one saying “AI is already as good as it’s gonna get, for a long while.”

This article, in contrast, is quotes from folks making the next AI generation - saying the same.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    0
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    It is conceptually the same thing. A series of interconnected neurons with a firing threshold and weighted connections.

    The simplification comes with how the information is transmitted and how our brain learns.

    Many functions in the human body rely on quantum mechanical effects to function correctly. So to simulate it properly each connection really needs to be its own super computer.

    But it has been shown to be able to encode information in a similar way. The learning the part is not even close.

    • @utopiah
      link
      English
      15 hours ago

      It is conceptually the same thing. […] The learning the part is not even close.

      Well… isn’t the “learning part” precisely the point? I don’t think anybody is excited about brains as “just” a computational device, rather the primary function of a brain is … learning.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13 hours ago

        No, we are nowhere close to learning as the human brain does. We don’t even really understand how it does at all.

        The point is to encode solutions to problems that we can’t solve with standard programming techniques. Like vision, speech recognition and generation.

        These problems are easy for humans and very difficult for computers. The same way maths is super easy for computers compared to humans.

        By applying techniques our neurones use computer vision and speech have come on in leaps and bounds.

        We are decades from getting anything close to a computer brain.