• @surewhynotlem
      link
      English
      41 month ago

      If we just had more people, that would get the per capita numbers down and the problem would be solved!

      Wait…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 month ago

      Per capita isn’t really important in this case. Overall output is. The planet doesn’t care if it’s getting less per capita from one place or another.

      Then, the other thing is that your graph is just CO2. There are many other gasses that are literally thousands of times worse than CO2.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 month ago

        Yeah the planet does not care at all. Neither the overall output or the per capita. We do.

        Problem is there is no reducing the overall output without solving the imbalance between developed countries and undeveloped countries (imbalance of the per capita emisions). Undeveloped countries will always try to achieve the same standard of living as the developed ones. And who are we to blame them?

        And I didn’t see real efforts of the developed countries to reduce their emissions fast enough. Why should the others? China has a plan at least.

        But humans be humans, so brace yourself it’s going to be hot.

        Or cold for the Europeans if the Golfstrom is really collapsing.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 month ago

          China is shilling out solar because its making them money. Overhead satellite stuff shows they’re throwing out loads of harmful emissions that are terrible for global warming.

      • @ppue
        link
        English
        11 month ago

        Per capita isn’t really important in this case. Overall output is. The planet doesn’t care if it’s getting less per capita from one place or another.

        I don’t see any value in that approach except for finger pointing and doomer posting.

        Then, the other thing is that your graph is just CO2.

        No, it is CO2eq.

    • @finitebanjo
      link
      English
      11 month ago

      That was a good argument before the CCP started pressuring people to have 3 children. They want to actively increase their population through means other than immigration.