• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -36 hours ago

    Less evolved as in the product of less evolution. There is such a thing as more and less because more happens over time.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Ok, but evolution doesn’t follow a straight path. The ancestors of whales looked like wolves, while whales look, act, and function much more like fish, which those wolf-like pre-whales evolved from way earlier up the line. This is a common misconception about evolution, so don’t feel bad for getting caught in it.

    • @Crankenstein
      link
      English
      26 hours ago

      To have “more or less” of something implies the effectiveness of the product is directly caused by the metric being measured.

      The amount of time a genotype took to evolve has no bearing on the effectiveness.

      There is no such thing as “more/less evolved”. There is no gradient. Something either is evolved to adapt to its environment or it isn’t.

      • @Mr_Dr_Oink
        link
        English
        13 hours ago

        I’m not disagreeing with you here, but wouldn’t it be fair to say there is a gradient, but it is dynamic and defined by the current environment and what it takes to survive it?

        Maybe the goal posta keep moving but we are talking about a very large time scale, so long that, for at least a couple of million years, what could be defined as more or less evolved might seem or be descibed as pretty solid.

        Although i suppose its not fair to say more or less evolved and might be more accurate to say more or less well adapted.