BrikoXM to Legal [email protected]English • 4 days agoSupreme Court wants US input on whether ISPs should be liable for users’ piracyarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square34fedilinkarrow-up176arrow-down11file-textcross-posted to: news[email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up175arrow-down1external-linkSupreme Court wants US input on whether ISPs should be liable for users’ piracyarstechnica.comBrikoXM to Legal [email protected]English • 4 days agomessage-square34fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: news[email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
SCOTUS asks US government for its view on $1 billion Sony v. Cox case. Case file: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2024/11/supreme-court-may-decide-whether-isps-must-terminate-users-accused-of-piracy/
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish15•4 days agoShould car manufacturers be liable for drunk drivers, stolen cars, distracted drivers etc?
minus-squareJackbyDevlinkfedilinkEnglish0•4 days agoThat’s a little different. I think auto manufacturers should have regulations that help protect drivers when they’re not driving at their best. Things like seat belts are a simple example.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•4 days agoThat’s a little regulation, not liability or mandating control of the product’s use.
Should car manufacturers be liable for drunk drivers, stolen cars, distracted drivers etc?
That’s a little different. I think auto manufacturers should have regulations that help protect drivers when they’re not driving at their best. Things like seat belts are a simple example.
That’s a little regulation, not liability or mandating control of the product’s use.