The president's justified, overdue, but probably too-late authorization to Ukraine isn't pushing us toward World War 3.

Summary

President Biden recently authorized Ukraine to use longer-range U.S. missiles to strike inside Russia, marking a small but overdue escalation in the conflict.

This decision aims to disrupt Russia’s military operations and bolster Ukraine’s position, especially with the potential Trump administration favoring pro-Russian policies.

Russia’s retaliatory missile strike on Ukraine, though deadly, represents more of the same tactics.

Analysts argue Biden’s earlier caution was excessive, and calling Russia’s nuclear bluffs is strategically necessary to counter further extortion.

  • @surph_ninja
    -9•2 hours ago

    You mean like the Zelenskyy regime, which is composed of Nazis, banned opposition parties & media, and refuses to hold elections? Is that not authoritarian?

    • theprogressivist
      2•41 minutes ago

      Oh, it’s the edgelord who is fighting an imaginary battle on the internet. How’s that been going for ya, champ?

    • @NewDay
      1•2 hours ago

      You do not hold elections during a war if your constitution says so. Many countries do it this way. Russia can hold as many elections as it wants because those are not real elections.

      • @surph_ninja
        -2•2 hours ago

        So just never stop the war, and you can keep holding office with a constant influx of billions! Brilliant trick!