• @Wogi
    link
    English
    21
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Conspiracy to blank requires at least one overt action, demonstrating that you intend to fulfill your commitment to blank.

    We could talk about doing blank all day, make plans to blank. Draw up little blank maps and assign blank duties. Until someone actually does something, it’s all just talk.

    • @Lennny
      link
      English
      91 month ago

      So, who wants to plan the next presidential assassination?

      • @Wogi
        link
        English
        3
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        No but you still gotta prove it. That and freedom of speech is a thing.

        I can say I plan to go and do any old crime, I can talk about it with my friends who might give me ideas. They might even volunteer to help.

        Until someone actually does something, all we’re doing is talking. We’re protected by the first amendment, and it would be damn near impossible to prove we actually intended to do anything.

        Unless we’re threatening elected officials. They tend to embed themselves, push for the plot, and still wait until they make an attempt to act on the conspiracy that they’re kind of responsible for.

        • @PriorityMotif
          link
          English
          11 month ago

          Chris Hansen enters the room: “go ahead and have a seat”

          • @Wogi
            link
            English
            21 month ago

            Notably, they had to actually show up at the house before the cops took any action.

            An overt action can be pretty simple, but it does have to happen.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            01 month ago

            Yep.

            My mandatory reporting is based on my interpretation of their intent not their actions.

            Sure, let the courts decide but that doesn’t quite equate to what precedes.