@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 10 hours agoSir David Leafenboroughmander.xyzimagemessage-square22fedilinkarrow-up1172arrow-down111
arrow-up1161arrow-down1imageSir David Leafenboroughmander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 10 hours agomessage-square22fedilink
minus-square@VerqixlinkEnglish1•23 minutes agoStickenborough is not a stick insect, they’re a leaf insect, so would be called Leafenborough
minus-square@HawkelinkEnglish44•9 hours agoBecause it’s a leaf insect not a stick insect. So the stick name is inappropriate.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish37•9 hours agoAh, thank you. I assume that’s in the blurriness I decided not to read.
minus-squaremanucodelinkfedilinkEnglish9•9 hours agoIt is actually in the first sentence of the last paragraph of blurriness though I could only make this out after reading the comment above about stick vs leaf insects.
Why rename?
Stickenborough is not a stick insect, they’re a leaf insect, so would be called Leafenborough
Because it’s a leaf insect not a stick insect. So the stick name is inappropriate.
Ah, thank you. I assume that’s in the blurriness I decided not to read.
It is actually in the first sentence of the last paragraph of blurriness though I could only make this out after reading the comment above about stick vs leaf insects.
It is. The first couple paragraphs are more legible.