🇦🇺𝕄𝕦𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕕𝕔𝕣𝕠𝕔𝕕𝕚𝕝𝕖 to Science [email protected]English • 3 days agoFuck geometrylemm.eeimagemessage-square47fedilinkarrow-up1313arrow-down113
arrow-up1300arrow-down1imageFuck geometrylemm.ee🇦🇺𝕄𝕦𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕕𝕔𝕣𝕠𝕔𝕕𝕚𝕝𝕖 to Science [email protected]English • 3 days agomessage-square47fedilink
minus-square🇦🇺𝕄𝕦𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕕𝕔𝕣𝕠𝕔𝕕𝕚𝕝𝕖OPlinkfedilinkEnglish-1•2 days agoIsnt it fine to assume a 90° angle its just that when u square side AC ur multiplying by i which also represents a rotation by 90° so u now nolonger have a triangle?
minus-square@calcopirituslinkEnglish3•2 days agoIt’s not fine to assume a 90° angle. The distance between B and C is 0. Therefore the angle formed by AB and AC is 0°. If the angle is 90°, then BC should be sqrt(2), not 0. Since the length of both sides is 1. sqrt(|i|2+|1|2) = sqrt(2).
minus-square🇦🇺𝕄𝕦𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕕𝕔𝕣𝕠𝕔𝕕𝕚𝕝𝕖OPlinkfedilinkEnglish0•2 days agoSo essentially what ur saying is. The imaginary and real arent 90° or pythagoras is only valid for real numbers?
Isnt it fine to assume a 90° angle its just that when u square side AC ur multiplying by i which also represents a rotation by 90° so u now nolonger have a triangle?
It’s not fine to assume a 90° angle. The distance between B and C is 0. Therefore the angle formed by AB and AC is 0°.
If the angle is 90°, then BC should be sqrt(2), not 0. Since the length of both sides is 1. sqrt(|i|2+|1|2) = sqrt(2).
So essentially what ur saying is. The imaginary and real arent 90° or pythagoras is only valid for real numbers?