Seriously i have zero idea what is going on with bluesky. I never used it. Why are people saying it’s centralised? I also heard that a lot of people are joining it.

  • Otter
    link
    fedilink
    English
    251 day ago

    Well, there are some things wrong with it though?

    It’s possible to criticize both Mastodon and Bluesky for their respective issues

    • Guy Dudeman
      link
      English
      341 day ago

      The issue is that BlueSky is a for-profit company.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        81 day ago

        B-Corp. But as long as they don’t show any kind of sustainable business model compared to their costs, ye the result doesn’t differ much

    • Carighan Maconar
      link
      111 day ago

      It’s possible to criticize both Mastodon and Bluesky for their respective issues

      Sure, they’re both Twitter-like and hence inherently unsuited to having a discussion for starters.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 hour ago

        Yeah this is kinda what I’ve never understood. We have these sorts of, complaints about the demographic movements of these platforms, sure, but their actual core structure is inherently optimized to prey on people’s worst instincts, make discussion basically impossible. To prioritize pithy remarks and one-liners over productive conversations, they prioritize public facing ideologues blowing up much smaller individuals. Lemmy’s slightly better in that regard, but I feel like we’re always somehow descending in quality from what even a basic forum would be capable of.